- Artists:
- Julian Casablancas »
- Label:
- Rough Trade »
As a musical reference point, people have the Eighties all wrong. Comparing new music to an entire decade is a pretty careless move to begin with, but the new artists that attract the comparison tend to be a world away from the spirit of synthpop, the genre that supposedly defines the period. Just because Little Boots, for example, uses some keyboards, it doesn’t make her music ‘Eighties’.
This infuriatingly homogenised take on ‘Eighties’ looms large as the cop-out reference point for Julian Casablancas’s first solo album. He’s the fourth Stroke to release solo material of some kind, and his record emphasises synths, drum machines, and a poppier approach than that of his parent band.
Unfortunately rather than evoking the thrill of Eighties experimentation, Phrazes For The Young smacks of a 1982 Tomorrow's World vision of The Future. Whoa! People are using computers to perform daily activities like toastmaking, and spelling with scant regard for tradition or accuracy! I picture Casablancas creating it holed up in a studio that resembles the Tron-indebted video to '12:51'.
There’s a contrived naffness at work throughout Phrazes which sits uneasily with Casablancas’ obviously accomplished songwriting and the strength of his voice. 'Out Of The Blue' features Talking Heads-inspired evasive drums, a horrible melody, breathless Strokesy guitars bubbling under, and ingratiating double tracked vocals. His voice is so processed on ‘4 Chords Of The Apocalypse’ it seems his strangled mechanical larynx is doing a pre-emptive Auto-Tune job. It’s faintly reminiscent of The Greatest-era Cat Power serenading herself with mournful soul numbers, but the giddy rent-a-carnival sounds in the chorus are a typically needless and showy addition.
'Ludlow Street' is a baffling, unintentionally funny microcosm of the whole album’s ill-conceived folly. It starts with keyboard using stock Eastern sounds not heard since Bowie's Berlin period, before giving way to sea shanty guitars, pointlessly busy drum programming and festive twinkling bells. There's some horns and a bad lyric about Puerto Ricans running. What a mess.
I guess he's tried to make a party album, but it's a party where coked-up nobodies are shouting over one another, desperate to say something impressive. The elements on single '11th Dimension' are all fine: a sprightly MGMT-like leading synth line; New Order-style high bass flourishes, and deep melodic drums that suggest someone's given Julian a dubstep comp. It feels, tight, agitated, sweaty, rather than pleasantly brimming over with parts left to flow organically. There are clearly a lot of good idea ideas here but they're not working together in any coherent way, and with so much happening it's a busy, unpleasant record to listen to, not helped by a painfully loud mastering job.
Part of the charm of synthpop classics like The Human League's '(Keep Feeling) Fascination' is that the equipment is audibly shoddy. It's hard to recapture the warped-sounding synths of its intro, because modern electronic instruments are built a lot better, and Casablancas’ experimentation with them comes off as charmless and occasionally smug. To be fair there's not much that sounds like this. It's a hubristic, aloof and pretty unexpected album. It’s also thankfully brief at eight songs and just over 40 minutes long.
Phrazes... ultimately comes off as a half-fascinating electronic curios from a rock musician, in the vein of Neil Young’s vocoder-heavy Trans album or Paul McCartney’s ‘Temporary Secretary’. Those were artists bravely dabbling with new electronic sounds, but MGMT and a ton of other artists smeared with the ‘Eighties’ adjective make synthplay borderline rote these days.
There are moments which hint at Casablancas’ underlying skill as a writer on Phrazes, but there’s such a ruinous deployment of disparate ideas that they never form a cogent whole. As he sings on ‘11th Dimension’ Casablancas has "music comin' out of [his] hands and feet and kisses woooo!" Fair enough, but it’s probably best not to use ALL of it, ALL AT THE SAME TIME isn't it, Jules?
Ha ha
this is going to be controversial. Personally I think the first three tracks are pretty astonishing and then it perhaps does get buried by the kitchen sink approach, but I quite enjoy all the texture floating about. Also I think it's as much a country-influenced record as an eighties/'eighties' one. Though 'eighties' country is as dark a sounding genre as I can imagine. Anyway, well-argued, even if I disagree, hope this comments thread doesn't turn into a total bloodbath.
Spot on
The first track and the single are both fantastic, the rest is a jumbled mess which just tries so painfully hard to impress it hurts the ears. At 8 tracks it runs out of oppotunities to redeam itself. Really dissapointing.
I was surprised to see the mark this got....
and then having read the review, still think it's a tad harsh, however the points you make are pretty accurate. The album I think is a bit of a....I suppose it just feels like a load of demos, and half thought out ideas, and since it's only 8 songs long, doesn't lead me to think JC has taken this all that seriously. Which doesn't bode well for the tickets I bought to see him next month.
Thank god someone is sane
I've been seeing good reviews and praise placed on this pile of rubbish from people who should know better and nme. Fuck the 80s...... Except XTC.
"and since it's only 8 songs long, doesn't lead me to think JC has taken this all that seriously"
Interesting logic there...
80s pt1...80s pt2....80s pt3
Your opening point is very true. I'm currently reading Garry Mulholland's The Greatest 261 Albums Since Punk and Disco and he makes a similar point, that 80s pop really has three distinct periods and can't really be lumped together neatly with in a convenient "80s" bracket.
I thought the single was
absolutely terrible. Pitchfork gave it a best new single. this album is tripe!
Finally a review that makes sense!
I love The Strokes but this made me want to cry. Can't believe the best spin off album came from Fab!
ha ha
looks like I totally failed to predict the reaction here! I agree it's a flawed and messy album, and that a lot of what Thom says basically makes sense but for me those first three tracks are enough to make the whole endeavor reasonably worthwhile.
wow, way to kill all my excitement to hear this!
fair enough though.
I'll see how I feel after I've listened to the whole thing (only heard one track so far and liked it...)
Someone's been listening to
too many Tori Amos albums if they think 40 mins is 'brief'! :)
one of the best pop records
i've heard in years.
i didn't see this as an attempted "party album" at all, i don't know where you're getting this from
it's more introspective than most of the strokes' stuff. it reminds me a bit of things like fear of sleep (especially left & right in the dark) and red light, only toned down. just because the relative "lightness" of the synth sound is not as intense as the music on tracks like those mentioned, isn't really enough for me to see it as any kind of party music, and i think it's all the better for it.
that said, there could have been a bit more variety, in vocal style especially, he has a lot more to play on.
3/10 though? no way.
yeah
serious dampener
3 !?
lolz, you cant be serious...
ha ha NME thinks its amazing
should i give it a try?
If this album really sucks, well, that'd be too bad
cuz 11th Dimension is rather dope.
3 is a remarkably low score
There's a wealth of ideas and textures in this album, it takes a few listens to unearth some of them but I'm finding it really rewarding on the sixth or seventh hearing
I'm not too keen on the mastering either though, it makes a lot of the songs sound overly messy and loud, with his voice struggling to break through the mugginess - The last three songs top anything from the latter half of First Impressions.. for me
i liked it
took a while, though
Sorry, but I have to agree with the review
This album sounds like a mess and his voice is painfully robotic.
Did this release really warrant a discursive essay on the complexity of 80s-influenced-pop?
It's clearly just a bit of fun he's bundled together whilst the rest of Team Strokes finish running marathons etc. There's some good wholesome pop to be had here but obviously this was never going to fill the Strokes-sized hole in the DiS spotifriday playlists. Like the Discovery EP from Wes & Rostam the attempt to create a profound, referential piece of work is about as genuine as their need to make any money off it.
Haven't heard this yet
but just checked out the clips on iTunes and they're selling a version with 3 extra tracks - one of which is a Christmas song!
This review was actually very amusing!
Am a big fan of the Strokes so i'll probably buy this. Actually let me listen to it on Spotify first,,,
Having listened to it through once
I think you're spot on about the loud mastering. Like you said, it's pretty busy too, which is due in part to the loudness of the album.
However, I am happy to kid myself and I think I will end up enjoying the record (I'd have at least given it a 6/10 on the first spin), as it exhibited flashes of genius in a few places.
Nevertheless, I will readily welcome his return to guitar music with The Strokes, if and when that happens.
My two cents as a newcomer...
... is that this album is not as good as Yours To Keep, but I think that was so good because I totally didn't expect Albert to deliver it. With Casablancas I think there's a little more expectation from fans and critics. There's some killer stuff on here, the chorus of Glass is great! Plus, I like the olde worlde collides with future aesthetic. Gunna see him next month anyway, it is Casablancas after all!
…I really, really like it
…but I think 'Little Joy' is the best Strokes-related spin-off record.
Pitchfork update...
...5.5 for the album. This sucks officially now.
Nice review, Thom! Very convincing and well argued. This is the rating I have seen here but then I am new.
I meant...
this is the LOWEST rating I have seen here yet.
you should hop on over
to the scouting for girls album review then...
I love this album, it's unabashedly fun and makes me want to dance my ass off through most of it. There's only one song I don't like, otherwise I think it's great. Sheesh, the guy stretches his legs a little and in return he gets a dissertation on what makes (not) an 80s record...whatevs.
i don't get it
say what you want about this album, but saying Out Of The Blue has a "horrible melody" makes me think you need your ears checked.
I have to agree...
As a former (huge) Strokes fan, I did have some expectations. Especially after the more than decent first single. It actually reminded me a bit of Phoenix! But along with 'Glass' it's the only good song on the album
Change of mind.
The more I listen to this album, the more incorrect and unfair your review seems; appropriately, one could quote 'Out Of The Blue''s lyrical chain of events ("somewhere along the way [your] hopefulness turned to... vengeance") to explain the ridiculously low scores this album has received critically.
I actually think it's a really well crafted record now and even the production job doesn't bother me so much anymore. If I was feeling generous I'd give it an 8/10, but it's a solid 7/10 regardless.



In Photos: White Lies @ Brixton Academy, London
In Photos: Monotonix @ Hector's House, Brighton
In Photos: The Specials @ Hammersmith Apollo, London
In Photos: Camden Crawl Launch Event @ The Blues Kitchen, London
Comments
- Post a new comment on this article